According to their website, the SCCA has the Elan in GTL.
ok gt2[b] page 56 2002 GCR under GTCS lotus elan s2 s4 [roadster coupe and drophead ==weight 1500 to1575 displacement 1558 etc etc = your are correct -thanks ----no notice for or about 26r -but if you show up with a 1400 pound car I think you will be in a meeting and returning the trophy 
-and again rad material- size is open -----ed
I just spoke to johnny walker and he recollects the following -
Johnny owns a book by Chris Harvey, entitled the " Elite, Elan and Europa" its a haynes book, anyways on page 202 and 203 it shows a photo spread of Jon Miles 26R, with a wide alloy radiator with a tag on it showing the maker as Marston (the same folks who make the stock radiators for the s1/s2) with header tank. A lot of folks consider this as close to factory effort there ever was with the elan - and so the miles car after wining just about every race it entered becomes the benchmark on how to prep’em and how they should look. Johnny’s also wondering if there is some kind of bizarre censorship going on up in the great white north.
Johnny also recalls the Homolgation papers being filed by the sales director Graham Arnold against the wishes of his boss . These same homolgation notes can be found in chapter 8 of the Robinshaw and Ross book on the elan as well as reproduced in original form on the website www.lotuselan.net. and so there is no real issue on the existence off these papers.
Johnny thinks there may be some confusion on Historic or in period regulations vs Current FIA historic regulations and current SCCA/FIA reg not to mention VMC historic/vintage regulations - for example:
In period, the 26R was first run in F modified for the SCCA, not production - then he thinks it was banned de-classed or something that amounted to please don’t bring these back to the track. The elans then show up in C production for 65 then get moved to B production ( party over for the elan, super seven gets banned outright) - the c/b prod cars in pictures look like modified elan’s not 26Rs - in this century SVRA use to place the 26R in either group 5 ( where sports racers and Modified"s go) or in Group 8 - You can now run provisional in group 3 if your weight and tires are where and what they want them to be - if you start winning though in true N.A. form they will move you out or hand you a weight penalty.
Any time I get stressed about this stuff I just have a few words with Johnny and everything gets put in its proper perspective -
George
Thanks for that George; I have the book; the caption reads “… The engine was very special, of course, producing around 160 bhp, with an oversize radiator to keep it reasonably cool.”
I would say the rad in the photo is maybe 1/2 an inch thicker than my Tony Thompson rad (one extra set of cores?).
There was a French 26/R racing at Le Mans Classic last year which also had the thicker rad.
ok not to put too fine a point on it but the original argument was — 1 there is a special aluminum rad that if you must have to be a 26r and 2 the cars were entered in events as as 26r ------ A – the rules state the cars can be up graded or back dated ---- and no where can I find a stipulation for rad material or size —and B no year book I have access to lists 26r in any class --only elan elan drop head and elan gt - now Charlie may be a qualified resource BUT its still hear say to me -----thanks --ed
Ed,
Judging by your recent posts it is clear that English is not your first language. I have no idea what you mean by “the rules” but, as far as the rest of the known universe is concerned, we choose to go by what the FIA homologation papers say.
If you can not find any reference to 26r (sic), why have you been telling us for the last couple of years that you have got one; not only that, it is, apparently, the world’s only DHC Shapecraft.
You have managed to discount and disrespect just about all of the world’s authorities on the Elan, not to mention the many members of this forum who have queried any of your “factual statements”.
Please don’t give up; you are really good entertainment value, every forum needs it’s clown.
aha —a personal attack —Ive won ed—ok this web was started to document these cars ----with hard printed and documented facts —not to hear some babble about a new aluminium radiator you purchased --or that some one else’s part had an extra row ----please — back up your statements with hard facts not your personal ‘expert’ observations - 
-----thanks --ed -
Do you know , folks , if in Italy or somewhere else , there is the same kindly discussion arround GTAM’s , TZ’s , Carrera’s , etc … !?!
Or did you found another way to keep your eyes open , late at night !?!
That will make my day , is to have some new pictures to have a look at , new good stories to read .
Stay cool , keep digging , whatever the distance , you ll finish to meet eachover.
Christian.[size=150]36R[/size]
Hi guys
Do you know, with all this turmoil in the world at the moment, this subject keeps me in fits of laughter.
Just when you think it’s all died down - up it flares again! Fantastic, please keep it going 
at all cost.
Sometimes on this great forum it can be a little bit too quiet with members discussing rubber extrusion & wiring diagrams (no offence meant - I’ve done it myself) but the old 26R subject is just about the best in ages.
By the way, Gary - where are you? or have you taken a back seat for a while in this discussion? I really miss your input.
For many of us, we will never own a 26R or even want one but it is a fascinating subject all the same.
I get the feeling that the REAL people that know the ACTUAL FACTS, are either long gone or are going to keep it to themselves. If you look at some of the old books, you will find most of the information you need.
By the way, just to stir it up a little bit more… I was having a look at an old Club Lotus News magazine last night and it was a 25 years celebration edition on the Elan from 1987 (I think) It had a page on the 26R which I will just list a couple of the main points to do with this subject (these being written by the late Graham Arnold). It said that the 26R had a lightweight aluminium radiator but that some prefered to use the large eary s1/2 header (I assume that means the old Marston one) & the other bit that Arnold said at that time was that the expert who probably knew the most about them was Mike Loughlin (of Ricketts Racing fame) - there was no mention of Tony Thompson at all. Read into that what you want - but at that time in '87, in Graham Arnold’s eyes, Mike was your man. There was also mention of the diff cooler & electric pump to work it, which went in the 26R/2. All interesting stuff…
I hope that everybody does not take this discussion too seriously though, hopefully we are all just having fun & learning at the same time… be a real shame if we lost someone like Kieth -type26owner, whose knowledge & opinions I for one still miss.
Sometime it is a little hard to tell if someone is have a joke or having a go, if you know what I mean.
All the best
Adam
I sincerely hope that Ed does not think I’m having a go; I think this is great fun and normal engineer’s banter.
Probably, given the sort of outfit that Lotus was back in the 60’s, the truth about how many of this that or the other were ever made will never be known; that is my “expert opinion” gained from reading loads of books written when all this stuff was relatively recent history.
Now, about my Sprint; could it possibly have been a secret factory development mule for the Esprit? 
…That’s the legendary Esprint !?!
Christian. 
Like many of you I can’t stop myself reading through the posts on this subject, it’s fun to see the sparks flying occasionally.
Just to add more fuel to the fire:-
Adam, the man not mentioned by by Graham Arnold does supply “FIA Approved parts” for “racing Elans” & that includes aluminium
(aluminum just to avoid any misunderstandings 
)radiators.
Furthermore Mr. Arnold held the position of “Sales Director” at Lotus, not what I would call a position with high involvement in things “technical”.
Many of the older issues of the “Club Lotus News” had major technical clangers, mostly eminating from aforsaid person.
It is unfair to speak of those no longer able to argue their part, so (unfortunately) no more from me on that.
One thing is for sure. Those people who are heavily involved with Elans not only know of the exsitance of LotusElan.net but you can bet they do keep their eyes on it (maybe with disdain?); be it only to make note of what parts they could remanufacture for a known market etc.
I can fully understand that such people &/or the many eminent Lotus racers in GB, who have the knowledge you mention would never entertain the idea of entering into a foray such as this one. Too much at stake 
Fanning the flames
John
John
I agree totally with everything you said and love him or loathe him, Graham Arnold was a character but all I was trying to point out was that in 1987, before the 26R was the crazy money it now seems to be, that is what G. A thought.
I also do not think that he was Sales Director when they were making the 26R (correct me if I’m wrong) but anyway I am sure he knew more about this stuff than me or you! With all this information on them, I think you have to cherry pick what you want to and disregard the rest as there are probably not good enough records left (somebody please prove me wrong here!) to ever say for once and for all who is wrong or right.
Tony Thompson in my opinion is a really good bloke & knows his stuff and if I had a 26R, he is the man I would be talking to. Very good racer too!
In my humble opinion, when they were racing these Elans, they were not at all interested in keeping files on chassis numbers & spec, they were only interested in racing & did not care too much about future values or history. It is only now of course, when a lot of money is at stake that it all really matters. Just a little glad I can only admire them & not have the money to contemplate buying one. I will stick with my S3 coupe for now, great subject though…
Regards
Adam
Im going to lie down now and dream of real race cars —ed AND btw heres apic of the drum corps I once belonged to ----the Jolly Jesters a very successful competing corps 00000 be a clown be a clown all the world loves a clown -----
26R body shell and chassis in the buff…
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Lotus-Elan-26R-Bodyshell_W0QQitemZ260380781891QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM?hash=item260380781891&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A2|65%3A10|39%3A1|240%3A1318
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Lotus-Elan-26R-Chassis_W0QQitemZ260380772997QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM?hash=item260380772997&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A2|65%3A10|39%3A1|240%3A1318
Tim
oh dear the great Canadian beaver has bit the dust -----Good news is its not a split beaver ---- --ed
Jeez,
I had to do a double take on the drum and fife - I thought is was a picture of a Klu Klux Klan meeting…
Which leads in nicely to fanning flames - The fact that the car is referred to as an R or sub type of the production car does little to help in tracking what was what. Lotus would have done everybody a favor by giving it its own type number like they did with the 47. The good news is for those enjoying the debate this can go on for a very long time …
George