elan+2 130s NBW 190M

Hi mbell,

The ball at the end of the selector shaft and the cavity in the brass shuttle that it interacts with, is just one of the sources of the ‘‘slop’’.
I don’t know the number of 5 speed +2 Elans that were produced but I suspect it was a very limited production run and consequently it is reasonable to assume many of the components that were not common to the Maxi, will have been individually machined and the ‘‘spec drift’’ associated with this method of production was necessarily accepted. Tooling up costs to produce the irregular tract in the brass shuttle to the accuracy of the irregular tracts formed by the inner and outer races of a CV joint would have been prohibitive.

Any re-design of the ball/shuttle would need to retain the existing ability to be re-engaged if the gear lever is accidentally removed without putting the box ‘‘in gear’’ first. As it is, the ball can be re-engaged with the shuttle using a wire hanger. An owner would not be a happy bunny if he had to virtually remove the engine and g/box to remedy that situation.

The second ‘‘slop’’ point is at the fork end of the gear lever. The later Elite/Eclat design eliminated much of this play by fitting a plastic ‘saddle’ to the fork and a correspondingly smaller diameter steel bar in the brass shuttle. This also eliminated the metal to metal rattle generated at this point. The outer contact of the fork with the brass shuttle seems not to have been altered.
If I could fit the Elite/Eclat tail shaft casing to the +2, I would do it in an instant. It is a much better machined and engineered component. The linkages have been re-designed with a 20degree alteration to the angle of the ball in central position (3rd 4th shift slot).

The third ‘‘slop’’ point is at the box end of the selector shaft where a virtually identical ball has had two parallel flat sides machined to produce the selector ‘tongue’ that drops into the three synchro shifters. Not much can be done here without altering the size and shape of the selector tongue. Very risky.

One point I feel almost obliged to mention here is the shimming and correct operation of the outermost synchro shifter. It operates the engagement and disengagement of the reverse ‘idler dog’ and the 5th gear sychro ring via a pivoted lever and a shaft right in the bottom of the box. This shaft is in turn restricted in it’s operation by the reverse lock-out mechanism which I have found to be problematic in 10 or 12 of the 30 odd 5 speed boxes I have had to deal with decades ago.
When I purchased my Ebay 5 speed for re-build I had a long look at this site just see if any good mods or alternative components etc. have come to light since I last dealt with one of these boxes. The only reference to this sometimes malfunctioning component I found was a mod. to the circlip retaining design mentioned in a well produced PDF. by an engineer. The operation and malfunction of the reverse lock-out mech. seems not to be covered by anybody after 50 years of living with the misery it can give. At the same time I noticed a number of contributors to this forum declaring the 5/Reverse shift is stiff, difficult, normal etc. and that they will just have to live with it. The box I bought on ebay suffered from this malfunction big time and is probably the reason it was permanently removed from the car. It also had a tight spot but I have no idea if this manifested before or after the box was removed. It could easily have been either.
The fix is tricky and difficult even if the box is out of the car, if not, the removal and re-fit is a headache of it’s own so I won’t detail it here. I doubt if many or any would go through the ordeal if they can still get 5 and reverse even if it is stiff.
If you come up with a viable mod. to correct any of the ‘‘slop’’ feel free to run it in front of me if you want.

Satyr Icon

The gearshift action of the 5-speed box can be improved. See viewtopic.php?t=45077

Interesting stuff Satyr, will need to spend some more time taking it in and processing it.

My main focus at the minute is improving the gearstick. I’ve a modded one like Jon showed in his link that remove a lot of flex from the bushing. I’ve got as far as playing with fusion 360 to design a replacement for the ball/retainer setup on the gear stick with a spherical bearing. I suspect that will be a bit improvement.

After that targets would be brass shuttle to gearstick stick and modding selector forks to have consistent/tight opening for the tongue.

I’ve currently got the box out of my car (and spare in the car) and hoping to make some improvements while its out.

Hi Jon and mbell,
That discussion is definitely one I missed. It does however contain what seems to be the mandatory adulteration of the D-dent spring application on the 5/Reverse rod. The rest of it is about modifications we, as a Lotus main dealership back in the day, would have lost the concession if we had exceeded our mandate and indulged in wild mods. Warranties would have been invalidated and god knows what else. Occasionally we had no choice other than to open up a box and repair it when really it should have gone back to Lotus on warranty. It was the mid 70s, Saudi had doubled the price of oil overnight, everybody was going on strike, 3 day working week, electricity could suddenly go off in the middle of the day and even Bonny and Clyde would not be able to get a warranty replacement 5Speed Box out of Lotus. Even common parts like bearings and baulk rings were sometimes unavailable from Lotus so I had to get them from BL at a third of the price. Very naughty.

The point I’m making here is my experience with the +2 Elans was when they were 3 or 4 years old and the Elite/Esprit/Eclat line was new or a couple of years old or so the work to revitalize the pre-load rubber cone on the gear lever for example was never necessary. Quite a few older Elans would appear in the workshop but usually they were owned by DIY’ers and we would only see them when they had made a major mistake or were unable to finish a job etc.

Back to the archived post.
I think the shift in the video is really tasty looking. The lever seems to be shorter and I don’t think the guy shifting through the gears ever engages 5th or Reverse. Is there a reason for this?
My recollection is that the stiff engagement/disengagement of 5 and R was something that would occur irrespective of mileage and we traced around a dozen of these complaints to the Reverse lock-out mech.

If mbell has his box out of the car at the mo. and it is exhibiting 5/R drag, now is the time to put it right.
You will of course need to pull the first motion shaft and pinion, often incorrectly referred to as 4th gear, (4th does not exist in this box, it is just a locked shaft, no increase or reduction of o/p ratio) and the third motion shaft and bearings etc. to get at the lock-out mech. Every time I have done this job I have done it with an empty box, no layshaft or Reverse dog-cog idler. You may be able to leave these in place but I have never tried to do the job that way so I’m not sure. Now that I’ve thought about it, you will need to remove the layshaft to drop the laygear out of the way to remove the first motion shaft. Easy to forget these things when the box is not in front of me. I am assuming you have a few of the bits and pieces needed to do this.
The ornate but elegant mechanism described in the PDF for locking the box to undo the big nuts and relieve stress on the gears is unnecessary but very pretty. We always just engaged two gears to lock the box which has to be chained to something stable to get the nuts undone.
As a matter of fact, any box that won’t take the stress generated by Lotus procedure as opposed to the PDF procedure, will never find it’s way into my car. The box should be able to take 3 or maybe 4 times this kind of stress before breaking. If it won’t, I don’t want it. Its’ junk.
One thing you will need is a torque wrench that will apply accurate lb/ft to a reverse thread well past 120lb/ft.
These tools are usually most accurate operating in the middle of their range.

Mbell, you may choose to strip the removed box you have even though it does not exhibit the 5/R stiffness.
I will do my best to find the photos of this mech. and my car etc. and generate a diagram to explain the process of the fault manifesting itself. Simple logic and the availability of time will determine if you want to do the strip or not.

In the post referred to by JonB, I see a pic of a +2 lever next to an S1 Elite. The difference is a surprise to me.
The Ebay Eclat box I rebuilt came with a lever absolutely identical to the +2 lever. Lotus were chopping and changing things a bit at the time. When I had to remove the lever to get an engine out I usually left the rubber bellows on the shaft so never really examined the shaft covered by the boot or bellows on the Elite.
Is the lever in the video a shortened +2 stick or one of those S1 Elite sticks?

I’m not an expert on these forums so I have to ask, is the ‘‘Upload attachment’’ button at bottom left of this page for adding a pic?

Regards
Satyr Icon

Good morning Satyr,
I’m following this topic with interest, we need to have a local meetup with a few other owners to swap advice and stories. Your reminiscences of your time as a Lotus franchised dealer would be really interesting.

To add pictures to your posts you are correct that you need to click on the Upload Attachment button at the bottom of the message pane, this will open a dialogue that asks you to select the file from your devices storage folder. Jpg pictures are best, but the file size must be less than 2mb or you will get an error message. I have attached a picture and a screenshot of the dialogue. There is the option to place the pictures inline with your message between paragraphs, it’s a bit fiddly to do this, so most people just upload and then post their message, the system inserts the photos beneath the message.

PS: click on the attachments to enlarge them


I swapped the box out as I was get occasional synchro issues on 3rd. So primary reason is to fit set of synchro rings but wanted to see what I could to upgrade the shift (more) and also fit the eclat input shaft/bearing set up while I was there.

This box is probably typical of a lot of 5 speeds it is been a bit troublesome and I had to mess with it a few times. Appears it(well the car) was rebuilt in early 90’s and then ended in a barn in the US for 20+ years. On getting it on the road it wouldn’t engage 4th but all the other gears worked. Removed it and found missing spacer from nose housing. Had one made for it and that fixed that. Then found 4th synchro was gone, so out again. Now issues with third, that could just be low fluid level from it leaking. But as I’ve now got spare gearbox in the car figured it was time to spend more time on it.

I’ve had to make up a few tools to enable me to work on them, but now been in a few of them. I haven’t messed with 5/rev mechanism. The original box in my car was very difficult to shift out of 5th, this was more of a locked in 5th than general stiffness. Spacing the dome nut off made a positive improvement as easy “fix”. I haven’t done that to my spare box but that seems to have more of a general drag on 5/rev than locking in 5th but so far isn’t too bad.

From memory I need to strip the box down far enough I’ll have access to the 5/rev mech to do 1/2/3 synchro’s so will take some time to check it out when I do that.

Hi mbell and all 5 Speed Guys,

Please wait until I get around to posting photos and detailed fix procedure. The locked 5 th etc. are classic symptoms of a problem I’ve fixed many times. There have been other obscure causes as well but nothing that recurred over and over again like this one. Sorry to keep you hanging on but it will be a lot of typing and messing with photos. The easing the common spring fix provides actually gives the game away. The single small component responsible for this misery is hard to believe.

I will try a bit of experimenting here thanks to the help from Spyder Fan.
No intention of irritating everybody but I found some pics of the roads the 5 box was made for.
When anybody in an Elan with a 4 box sees these kind of roads stretching out for hundreds of miles in front of the nose, their heart probably sinks. A 5 box just eats these roads up.
This will just be an experiment to make sure the pic resolution etc. is OK
For fun, can anybody tell me what is missing from almost every pic?

Mbell will see roads like this in the US in states like Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma and the Dakotas etc. if those are the states he has to cross. When he says he needs a 5 box he ain’t kidd’n. Mark will have seen something like this in his Elise.

Photos don’t really show the incline very well. This is the relatively easy stuff. The 2 and 3 gear climbs are too tricky to photo unless one wants to take the ‘Express’ back down to the valley.

Eventually the place levels out again before the real testing stuff.

Apart from potholes and 4th rate repairs, has anyone spotted the ‘MISSING’ element?

I finally get home and get my boots off so I can do my new wheels. The climbs into Portugal from Spain and the ones in Portugal are too tough to take pics with one hand so I won’t bore you all with anymore pics.

By now the ‘MISSING’ must be really obvious. TRAFFIC!!!
Only about 90% of Spain is like this and 50% of France, Portugal is OK as well but central Portugal where I have a spot, is corrugated with mountains ( my ‘crib’ is near the top of one of them ) and not all the roads have the extra lane on the up-side for commercial vehicles. That said, Portuguese drivers have patience like you don’t find in France or ‘Jolly Old’.

One of the reasons for the pics and monologue is, on the ferry to St. Malo were about a dozen vintage WWII military vehicles from UK that met up with a 40 or more strong group from Germany. They were doing some sort of a club run to Gibraltar and back through Spain and France to Calais. The German vehicles looked like they had all been restored to factory spec. A few of them hovered around November Bravo Whiskey but looked at it as if it was a piece of plastic rubbish. A Brit. with a sense of humor asked me if I was with the convoy and said he thought the camouflage was great but the car didn’t exist until 30 years later.
Spyder will no doubt get the joke. These were all transport vehicles, munitions trucks, troop carriers, jeeps, lots of staff cars and I saw at least one ambulance, no combat or armor. The Germans looked like they could re-build an engine on the side of the road if somebody got into trouble. Strength in numbers.

Does this forum ever organize something similar?

I think I have the measure of the pics. insertion and text stuff.
My next submission will hopefully be more meaningful.

Satyr Icon

Hi All,

For anybody who ’ needs ’ to fix the 5/ Rev shift stiffness, the bad news is you will have to get your box looking like the pic below at least if you suspect the following applies. The well meaning suggestions regarding weakening the heavy spring and plunger combination in the bottom of the box can prove fatal to the box, particularly if you are going to use the vehicle a great deal. The easy spring/plunger/washers etc. fix is equivalent to a good friend suggesting you fix your flat tire by drilling another hole in it – to let more air into it.

You can leave the ‘lock plate’, lever and shims bolted to the box, remove select. shaft as per manual. I use a 1/4 drive deep reach socket of appropriate dia. to retain the spring and ball in the ‘‘lock’’.
The excessive force usually applied to shift 5 or Rev. tends to mangle the lever pivot and it’s corresponding drilling in the lock plate. If the retaining circlip is mangled and bent out of shape, chances are the drilling and pivot won’t be in great shape either. The ''5 Speed PSD. ‘’ offers a fix for this but I will only address the main issue here.

Once the works are removed, the first thing I do is check is the ball ended sliding lock key that lives in the ‘‘lock’’ which is the irregular shaped casting you will have driven the selector shaft out of. This slider (key) looks like a machined shaft with ball bearing at each end. This slider should fall effortlessly from the lock when you invert it or during dismantling process.
If it does not, you have probably not seen it yet because it is seized, partially or completely, inside the lock body. There is only one way out of the lock for this component, unlike the spring loaded ball next to it.
My experience is this sliding shaft can be seized to varying degrees between bad and nightmare.
The latest box I fixed with this fault is one of my own, purchased on Ebay. Two hours of tapping, levering and heating and it was still tight to the last 1/4 inch.
The following pics are two slightly different angles of what you will see when this component is seized.
These two pics were taken after the slider was freed so the left hand ball is as it should be when seated in it’s D-dent in the shaft.

A slightly different angle showing the gap that opens up around the ball where it emerges from the lock body.

When the sliding key is seized in the lock, slightly more of the dome is visible than seen in the left hand lock.
Sliding the lock body along the selector shaft should be not quite effortless but easy bearing in mind that the only drag that must be overcome is the pressure of the spring loaded ball, housed in the hump closest to the camera. When slider is seized, pulling the shaft from the lock can be very difficult depending on how bad the seizure is.
The left/H ball position is common to all gears except when 5 is engaged and the ball emerges to lock the selector in that gear and eliminate the possibility of Rev. being engaged. The R/H lock mech. shows the slider at the highest point of travel, when it engaged with the notch in the lock plate control rail and 5th gear is engaged.

The following is a combination photo/drawing with the lock body ‘ghosted’ to show what is going on at the top of the key shaft and it’s bore.

The coloured area indicates the ‘moat’ that appears when the ball is at it’s lowest point. This acts as a collection area of oil and the metal particulate content of same. When 5 is selected and the ball face is forced upward, any particulate which is not small enough to pass down the sides and back into the box, is pressed and compacted into the wall of the bore by the curved face of the dome. This happens to the entire circumference of the bore and as the bore/slider clearance decreases, the smaller particulate also becomes impacted to the bore wall.

At this point those not interested in how and why this insignificant component determines the shift quality of 5/Rev. and do not wish to join the ‘Gearbox Academy’, get the slider out, clean the bore down with a neatly rolled strip of emery paper ( 180 grit is good )clean it all and nail the thing back together and get back on the road.
For the academics, a photo layout of the actual components should help.

In this photo all components are in their horizontal position at Neutral. The lock key ( shown suspended above the lock ) is actually buried in the lock immediately below it and precisely South of where it appears. The bottom dome of the slider is resting in his D in the shaft ( gravity contact only ). It should also be noted that the spring loaded ball housed in the hump on the r/side of the lock is engaged with his own D in the shaft providing a ‘‘soft lock’’ on the selector shaft we are all familiar with.

When engaging 5 from this position, the rod, A - C, is pulled through the lock body by the pivoted lever on the left. The lock itself is prevented from moving with the shaft or rod, by a limiter on the downward facing control track of the lock plate. The slider key is forced out of its’ D in the shaft and upward so that the upper ball end locates in the notch which can be seen on the L/side of the lock plate control track.

The above pic has a second selector shaft added at the bottom to show where the D-dents are situated inside the lock body. In 5th, the slider is resting on the high land of the shaft, forcing the slider upward. The D immediately to the right is never visited by the slider, it is exclusively used by the ‘‘soft lock’’ spring loaded ball when N and Rev. are selected.

In normal operation, effort at the top of the pivoted lever would have to overcome the resistance offered by the ‘‘soft lock’’ ball, negligible friction in the lock and bore of the box casing, the heavy D-dent spring and plunger in the bottom of the box and the engagement of the sychro hub and 5th gear.
If the sliding lock key becomes seized, it takes a position somewhere midway between the upper and lower travel limits. It will not lock properly or release properly. Basically noman’s land.
Depending on how solid the seizure is, the slider will be applying considerable ‘grip’ on the shaft when the shaft should pull through the lock with little effort. This will translate as a noticeable difficulty engaging and disengaging 5th gear.

Refer to pic above.
To disengage 5th and move to N, the green highlighted part of the shaft must be pushed back through the lock body until the 5th gear release D-dent is under the slider and it can disengage its’ upper end from the notch in the lock plate control rail by dropping into the D in the shaft. Until this occurs, the lock body will be held in position where you see it in the pic. Once the green highlight section of shaft is pushed through the lock body, the lock body and shaft are free to move to the right of the photo to engage Reverse gear.

The above pic shows R engaged. The lower Shaft has been added to show the extent of travel from N and to assist orientation.
The L/H side of the lock plate control rail is now exposed and the lock notch can just be seen to the L of the lock body.
Unfortunately or fortunately, the clearances of this design are relatively huge and allow the partial jamming of the 5/Rev. mechanism when the slider key seizes. If these components were precision machined and the slider even started to seize, 5 and Rev. would have become immediately unavailable and nobody would have started talking about shimming out the main 5/Reverse positional spring and plunger.
This box needs the tight location it came with. You only need to down shift from 5 a bit too enthusiastically a few too many times and get those ‘‘dog tooth’’ Rev. gears kissing each other at 3 or 4,000 rpm to find that out. Get it badly wrong just once and you will wish you had drilled a hole in your flat tire.

For convenience I will repeat an earlier pic from above.

The casement drilling for the 5/R selector shaft is in relatively soft alloy and no hard bearing surfaces. It is designed to sustain light stress location of the shaft A-C. B is not designed to act as a fulcrum, only to guide, lightly support and allow the shaft to access the tailshaft housing where it operates the 5th gear sychro. Since both A and C are both effectively unsupported, B will act as a fulcrum when any up and down or sideways force is applied to A or C. The drilling is only designed for fore and aft movement of the shaft.

When K is seized in the lock body in a position which is neither ‘lock’ or ‘release’, the clearances of the mech. allow the lock body to be forced along the lock plate control rail while the sliding key is still only halfway between lock and release condition. This expands the distance between the control rail and the upper surface of the shaft because the ball ends of the slider are both ‘riding’ the high lands of the components they are in contact with. The lock plate is solidly bolted to the side of the casing and so, the control rail at the bottom of it can be considered immovable. When the expansion occurs, halfway between A and the casing at B, the result is considerable downward pressure on the A end of A - C forcing B to act as a fulcrum, which it was not designed for. Since the lock plate and control rail are immovable the only component with the necessary ‘give’ in it is the unsupported A end of A - C, the selector shaft.

Adulteration of the main 5/N/R location plunger and spring may give the impression of easing the 5/R shifting but it only really serves to encourage continued use of the car/g-box despite the true malfunction. Any side or down thrust on ( A ) will produce excessive wear and distortion of ( B ) over an unknown mileage or time.
It may be useful to remember that if and or when, the casing at ( B ) gives way, what happens at ( A ) will be inversely expressed at ( C ), which carries the selector fork which needs to be parallel with the sychro hub to make a clean engagement.
If you have a ‘‘trailer queen’’ with the 5/R tough shift, I’d just leave it but if serious mileage is on the cards …

I don’t know any easy way of doing the above fix or any ‘sure-fire’ way of confirming if that one small component is indeed seized, without stripping the box. No intent to depress anybody here just a possible fix and a little warning.
Sixty years ago I had an engineering tutor who got fed up with a string of my easy fix solutions to mechanical problems, he said ‘’ If we’re gonna talk about the s–t, we’re gonna talk ‘bout the s–t the way the s–t REALLY is, anythin’ less and we’re just sitt’n here gett’n older fer nuth’n.‘’ Sounded good to me then, still does.

Satyr Icon

Hi Satyr,

Sorry for delayed response, I’ve been away. Now on with try process and understanding this.I think I understand the issue and roughly what is going on but need to get into my box so I can see it for myself to have confidence in understand it fully but that likely a few months away.

Really appreciate the detailed information and photos. You’ve very likely saved me trashing my box at worse or having to fit/remove the engine/gearbox an extra time at best!

Thanks,

Mark

Hi Mark,
All the text and pics make it look complicated. It only takes five minutes to show the fault with the box in front of us.
Basically what is making the 5/Rev. shift difficult is the selector shaft is not moving through the lock without resistance from the sliding key being seized. The seizure can also make reverse stiff but not always.

I know it is a bitter pill to swallow but I don’t any way around it. The idea that a one inch sliding component can make an engine and box removal necessary is hugely irritating. The dismantling of the box is no mean feat either. If you already have a box out, half the job is already done.
One thing worth remembering is not to tap the 3rd motion/output shaft forward at all until the 3rd gear sychro collar has been removed. The manual shows a drawing of this hub being removed at an angle. If the output shaft has been bumped forward 1/2inch the synchro hub can very difficult to get off. There is very little clearance.

In an earlier post you were thinking of having your box machined to accept the later stronger 1st motion shaft bearing fitted. This may not be worthwhile if the car is not going to do 70 or 80,000 miles. My own older type bearing ( thinner Maxi ) OEM version actually lasted for 150,000 before it started to whine a bit. I only decided to rebuild a new box because it started really whistling at 80/90 mph. 50,000 miles later. The real deciding factor will be the availability issue of the bearing. I suspect the original thin one is more or less extinct now.

One test worth doing is with car stationary and the engine off, if reverse is normal selection but 5 tough to get in but easy to get out of, the sychro and baulk ring are more likely to be the cause. If 5 is tough to get in and tough to get out, the selector shaft is the problem. Remember that reverse has no drag from a synchro hub to overcome to engage so if reverse is tough as well the most likely culprit is the nasty little slider key in the lock mechanism.

If you do get round to dismantling the box in a few months time, don’t hesitate to make contact here. If your 5/R selector shaft is being impeded by the lock key you may well need a little advice turning the shaft 180degrees to disengage it from the pivoted lever above it.
It will be interesting to see if the selector shaft is indeed ‘grabbed’ by the key.

Good luck.
Satyr Icon

An S2 Elise is on my bucket list. I’d really like to swap info

Hi Satyr,
Sorry for the late reply, I must have missed the threads.

There are quite a few S2 Elise’s to choose from, mine is the VVC engined 111S and in all honesty the best car I have ever driven.

It has around 158 bhp and about 130 ft/lbs of torque so not massive, however for the 760 Kgs it comes in at, it’s pretty good. The only thing I would change is the gearbox (groans :cry: ) for the closer ratio B4BP but with a longer 5th, but in reality it really is good in standard guise. It’s agile, small and gives all the thrills without the need for massive horsepower. I have a V6 Exige which puts out much more power, but around the Alps it does not come close to the Elise. What does let it down a bit around the Alp, is that with two fat guys, a full tank of fuel and luggage it doesn’t pull half as well up the slopes, similar I guess to what you mentioned earlier. But still, a great car.

Going back to the 5 speed lever, you mentioned “pushing it further down into the box”, do you mean just compressing the bellows? I’m not quite sure of what you mean. Also you’re right about the oil, I am using some very expensive MT oil as recommended by others on here. My 5th is very very good, it’s just the other 4 that are not up to snuff and it’s a big noisy as in dB, probably due to it alloy construction. I’m due to drop the oil soon so I’ll try some 20/50 and modify a spare lever if you tell me what to change on it. If it’s no better the 4 speed will go back in.

Cheers
Mark

Thanks Satyr,

I happy that it will all be fully clear with the box in pieces in front off me. Until then i just "think"i understand it.

Thanks for the comments on 3rd gear synchro collar. I’ve actually experience that issue help a friend strip down a box. Spent a few minutes, fiddling with no luck. Then managed to get it out, so must have moved the 3rd motion shaft back a bit.

On the input shaft/bearing I think I have all the parts to change it over with out any machining. I bought a eclat gearbox with shredded 1st motion gear. To fix that i bought a used input+1st motion gear assembly. Which I then fitted. So I think if I use the 1st motion gear from current box with the shaft removed the eclat box i can convert it.

My memory is that it was slightly stiffer to engage/disengage reverse and engage 5th but not very bad. It would only disengage 5th with very strong tug.

Hoping to get to stripping the gearbox backend of this year. First job is to drive the a bit before weather gets too bad now its working, while working on improved gearstick design. Now had friend 3d print me prototype and bought spherical bearing for it. So some progress is being made. Need to collect the 3d print and do some testing/measuring. Probably few adjustments and get it machined.

Thanks for you offer of help, I let you know how i get one when i do get to it.

Mark

Hi Satyr. Thanks for posting your explanation, very informative and I appreciate how much work goes into writing something like that. You can be certain that if I still had the car I would be pulling the gearbox for a look.

My Plus 2 suffered from needing what I called a “manly tug” to get from 5th to 4th gear like Mark’s car, but it was easy to get into 5th or reverse. So I take it that this wouldn’t indicate a problem with that sliding detent mechanism. At the time, Mark advised it was quite normal as it (the 4th synchro) had to “spin up the entire input shaft”, as he put it. See https://lotuselan.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=40681&f=51&start=45#p284561. The fix I ended up with (weaken the 5th gear detent spring) worked, but only after some fettling to stop it jumping out of 5th. I was never happy with it, and despite what people were saying I could not really accept the box had the 5th-4th gearchange stiffness from new. I didn’t read any contemporary reviews that mentioned it, and I think they would have done. This suggests to me that the difficulty going from 5th to 4th occurs after the car has done real mileage and thus can’t be considered normal behaviour.

Hi Mark,
''Going back to the 5 speed lever, you mentioned “pushing it further down into the box”,

Yes, compressing the bellows and selecting any of the gears WHILE MAINTAINING that compression to the bellows very often seemed to normalize the shifting of all gears. Very easy to conduct this experiment with the box still in the car but I consider this to be an unconfirmed perception. Absolute confirmation would mean dis mantling the lever and removing the bellows so there is no preload to overcome. I have to use two hands to do this experiment, one hand to compress and the other to complete the shifting. Hardly the the way anybody would wish to operate this box '‘in the field’.
The lever and the shifting will seem very odd without the preload but you would be able to confirm if the shifting is indeed easier with the lever fork deeper in the box without the double handed aberration affecting the ‘perception’. You would be at liberty to experiment with different depths of insertion. ( OMG, am I still allowed to use that last word?)
I intended to do this full experiment with the Ebay box I purchased but came up against the inevitable time element problem.

You mentioned ‘‘noise’’ from your box so just for the record I’ll give you the data on the Ebay box on the test drive to Portugal.
First important thing to bear in mind is for the entire 3,000 mile return trip, the transmission tunnel upholstery and associated sound absorbing material was removed so I could hear everything that was happening in the box. I could actually see the alloy casing etc. at the bottom of the dash.
This was because I was not impressed with the sound of the box on the two or three short test runs I had time to conduct. At various stages of the ‘run’ I also used an infra red temperature sensor to monitor the temp. of the box. If anything was drastically ‘bad’ with the box it may have expressed itself in the form of excess heat and given me the chance to abandon the road trip before any terminal damage.
During the 150 miles from Kent to Poole (M25 and A3) at night, the box/casing temp. was 40-47 C. In France it went to 50 C and across Spain ( have another look at the pics I posted earlier and guess the velocity) at ambient of 35 C. and constant speed for 2 - 3 hours, the box temp never exceeded 55 C. I think this was a good result.

The sound however was becoming very irritating approaching the Spanish frontier. I did this trip with one, two hour stop for ‘shut eye’ and refreshment and two, one hour stops. Important meeting waiting for me in Port. I covered the 1,200 miles from St. Malo to my ‘‘crib’’ more or less in one shot.
I detail the perception parameters here because my empiric is, extreme fatigue tends to bend ‘perceptions’ well out of shape so I need to partially discount how ‘‘irritating’’ the box noise seemed.

There is a huge amount of data regarding the various sounds from these boxes and how they vary under varying conditions which I might be able to go into with a complete saga of the purchase procedure of the Ebay box, initial assessment at point of purchase , inspection, obtaining bearings, dismantling, observations etc. etc. at another time. For example, a box that is noisy in 5 under power but goes quiet on overrun indicates something quite different to a noisy box in 4 and so on.

To complete the ‘‘trip/box’’ saga above, after NBW sat still for a few days and I had to use it for a short journey in Port. and I recovered a few nights of sleep, the sound was normal. These boxes are never going to be quiet because they never were in th first plce.

Will have to continue this later, just ran out of time again.
Regs Sayr Icon

[quote=“Satyr Nouveau”]
Hi Mark,
Yes, compressing the bellows and selecting any of the gears WHILE MAINTAINING that compression to the bellows very often seemed to normalize the shifting of all gears.

Hi Satyr,
I am fortunate to have a really good spare gear lever, with a near perfect bellows that I can move up and down by hand. So if I am correct in what you are saying, is that I need to add some kind of “packer” between the underside of the circlip and the top of the rubber bellows. I’m guessing the easiest way here is to get a split collet fabricated and fit in between. If thats the solution, I’ll get one made.

thanks
Mark

Hi Mark,

Apology to anyone waiting for reply, Central Portugal caught fire, you probably don’t see this on news. My Fortess of Solitude was on fire.

Mark, if circlip is already removed and bellows can slide up or down shaft, just fit lever to box in normal way and try shifting gears with the lever at different depths in the box. This is only an experiment to determine if Lotus got the leverage ratios a bit wrong. If it works better, you may want to modify the gearstick so it can operate at the new depth.
Any packing or shimming between the circlip and bellows will just increase the pressure of the bellows. The whole experiment should only take 20 minutes if the bellows is already free, mine is seized solid so I did not want to take the risk of destroying it.
This experiment does not risk damaging anything whether the box in in the car or on the bench. Just don’t try driving the car anywhere with the G/stick in the experimental condition.

At a point in time in the past I was running a 2.2 Esprit and a Twincam Europa. The back end of the Europa was set up and shimmed the way it should be. Like your Evora/S2 Elise experience, getting out of the Europa and then driving the Esprit made the Esprit feel like a pig in comparison. I know this is heresy to say it but the Esprit was clearly a heavier car and way too wide for comfort. It just did not handle the narrow ‘SPAGHETTI’ Kent roads like the Europa.

For any +2 readers here, when I had to replace the steering rack on NBW, I opted for a Europa rack which has a higher ratio rack and pinion. The steering is noticeably quicker but heavier in the Asda carpark, love it.
When I go shopping I use Suzuki van.

Regards
Satyr Icon

Hi JB and MBell,

The easy bit to remember with the 5Box is that the slider key/lock mechanism ONLY controls and has any effect whatsoever on 5 and R.
Slider key goes up for 5 (or tries to) or down for N and R (or tries to). The key can seize in the UP position or the DOWN or in the middle like my Ebay box was. When the key is seized in the middle of it’s travel, both R and 5 are stiff to get in AND out. If 5 is easy IN but tough to get OUT, the key is being prevented from achieving it’s upper travel. It does not necessarily mean the key is seized solid, narrowing of it’s bore at the top of the lock is just preventing it’s full upward travel. The upward travel lets go of the 5 selector shaft so it can slide through the lock and pull the sych hub and baulk ring onto the back of the 5 gear and thereby, the engaged condition of 5.
R will often be normal engagement and disengagement.

If you have trouble fast down shifting 5 to 4, you have a compound problem, (two separate issues disguised as one). Once you have ‘gorilla’ shifted out of 5 and into N, you have escaped the influence of the faulty lock/slider mech. and are instantly dealing with a separate malfunction if having difficulty engaging 4.
This is likely, but not limited to, rounded off synch./ baulk ring teeth.

A third shift problem with 5, R and 4 and sometimes 3 is the tongue which lives on the main selector shaft at the top of the box develops a D-dent of it’s own on the rounded faces of the tongue that come into contact with the three selector shafts. This is usually a product of lazy or improper shifting by the driver over time.

Also, the shimming of the lock mech. (between the casing and the mech.) is not as well calculated as it could have been from the factory with the result that the gear lever needs to be pushed as far as it can go toward the driver to select 5 or R.

I don’t see any reference to this shimming procedure anywhere on this forum but just for the record, this shimming will ultimately decide how far to the right the lever needs to moved to engage 5 or R. Too much or too little shim can lead to the D-dent fault on the face or faces (front and rear) of the selector tongue.

Out of time again.
Regards
Satyr Icon